There are a few problems that may arise in your bankruptcy because you used credit cards to finance your gambling. This article will not go into all of the potential problems that may arise, but will rather focus on the issue of fraudulently incurred debt under Section 523(a)(2)(A).<\/p>\n
You may have been on a roll or addicted to gambling. You maxed out your credit cards under the belief that you could payoff the cards with your winnings. Things got out of hand and after several thousand dollars of cash advances you simply buried yourself in debt. While you were making the minimum payments on your cards you took out a second mortgage to payoff some credit card debt and went right back to the casino. A short while later you once again maxed out your credit limit under the unreasonable (hindsight being 20\/20) belief that you could repay all the debt when you won. Now that your financial situation is bleak you turn to bankruptcy<\/a> to achieve debt relief and get a fresh start.<\/p>\n \u00a7523. Exceptions to discharge<\/strong> In short, if you fraudulently obtained money the resulting debt is not discharged in bankruptcy. For the credit card company to succeed in excepting the cash advances from discharge it will have to prove 4 things:<\/p>\n (1) you obtained the money through a material misrepresentation that, at the time, you knew was false or made with gross recklessness as to its truth; Starting with the question of whether you made a material misrepresentation as to your intent to repay the debt, you will probably by okay. At the time of your gambling you held the unreasonable belief that you were going to repay that debt with your future winnings. Fortunately for you, your ability<\/em> to repay the credit card debt at the time of the cash advances is not what determines your intent. You used the credit card because you didn’t have the funds at the time; of course you couldn’t repay the debt when you used the cards. Rather, when you used the card to withdraw the cash advance the court will look at your intention<\/em> to repay as determined by the totality of the circumstances. The court will look at your subjective intent to repay, meaning your individual state of mind when taking the cash advance. In your case, you held that unreasonable but nevertheless genuine belief that you would repay the debt with future winnings, and your conduct mirrors that intention; you took out a second mortgage to payoff some cards and always made minimum payments. Since there is no subjective fraudulent intent to not repay the cards when you were taking the cash advances, your debt will not be excepted from discharge under Section 523(a)(2)(A).<\/p>\n Note: the above situation is borrowed from the fact pattern in In re Rembert<\/a>.<\/p>\n Are You Considering Filing For Bankruptcy?<\/strong><\/p>\nThe Problem<\/h2>\n
\n(a) A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt…
\n(2) for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained by\u2014
\n(A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n(2) you intended to deceive the creditor;
\n(3) the creditor justifiably relied on the false representation; and
\n(4) its reliance was the proximate cause of loss.<\/p>\n